Our team is experienced in providing ePRO, randomization and other clinical trial solutions for Nicotine-related studies.

IVR Clinical Concepts provides Nicotine-related study services including ePRO and IVR/IWR and Clinical Trial Material Management (CTM).

Client TypeNicotine-Related Research Product TypesIVRCC Services Description

Countries & Sites

Subjects

Consumer Products CompanyMentholated Cigarette Biomarkers
  • Randomization
  • Reporting
  • DCF management
  • Audit trail
  • Update data module
Randomization, single-blind, parallel-group, multi-center.

Controlled clinical study evaluating biomarkers of tobacco products exposures.

USA, 10 sites

480

Consumer Products CompanyeVapor Cigarette Biomarkers
  • Randomization
  • Reporting
  • DCF management
  • Audit trail
  • Update data module
Evaluate changes in biomarkers of cigarette smoke exposure when smokers switched to e-vapor products. 

USA, 10 sites

450

Consumer Products CompanyMoist Snuff or Snus Biomarkers Comparison
  • Randomization
  • Reporting
  • DCF management
  • Audit trail
  • Update data module
Randomized, parallel, four-arm cohort study to compare differences in urinary biomarkers of exposure (BoE) in adult nicotine or tobacco consumers using moist snuff or Snus.

5-day in-clinic confinement.

USA, 6 sites

170

Consumer Products CompanyNicotine pharmacokinetics of P4M3 Gen 2.0 compared to conventional cigarettes (CC)
  • Subject self-registration to ePRO VAS and questions
  • Reporting
Investigate nicotine PK profiles and subjective effects & related behavioral assessments of 2 electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) variants for product evaluation compared to cigarettes.

USA, 10 sites

36

Consumer Products CompanyBoE/BoPH of 5 variants of HTP (Heated Tobacco Product) v. conventional cigarettes (CC)
  • Randomization
  • Reporting
  • DCF management
  • Audit trail
  • Update data module.
  • SMS daily ediary with compliance reporting
Assignment  to 8 cohorts. 

5 variants plus continue smoking, assisted smoking cessation, never-smokers.  

IP resupply: dispensations/returns in-clinic & ambulatory.

USA, 20 sites

900

Consumer Products CompanyBioavailability of nicotine delivery from HTP (Heated Tobacco Product) v. conventional cigarettes (CC)
  • Subject self-registration to web-based ePRO questions and VAS scales
  • Reporting
Randomized cross-over 4 cohorts. 

3 variant Heated Tobacco Product (HTP), 1 conventional cigarette (CC)

UK,  1 Site

24

Consumer Products CompanyPuffing Topography: 

2 cohorts flavors.

Open Label, 4 groups self assignment. 

Glo device,  electronic. Product Use and Behavior instrument (PUB) 

  • Subject enrollment tracking
  • IRT product assignment (Open Label and subject selected randomization)
  • Test Product accountability
  • Dispensation to subject with return of unused IP
  • ePRO questionnaires
  • Reporting
  • DCF management
  • Update module
Usual Brand (UB) &/or CC and/or UB HTP to 1 of 4 gloHTP  IPs, 2 heating modes. 

28 days ambulatory,  14 days acclimation, 14 product test.

Multi-center, open-label, parallel-cohort-study, 4 variant HTPs.

In support of a Premarket Tobacco Product Application (PMTA)  HTP submission to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco.

The study will assess the puffing topography of glo HTP IPs as used.

USA, 4 sites

200-250 enrolled, 200+ completed

Consumer Products CompanyTobacco-free nicotine pouches (NP) PK profiles
  • IRT, ePRO includes VAS
  • ABOUT Q instruments
Exploratory. Compare PK profiles with commercial nicotine pouches (NPs).

Randomization open-label. 

Williams Design x-over & in-clinic.

6 periods, 6 sequences.  

Screen, enrollment, confinement, questionnaires, iPad.

UK

96 screened, 24 randomized

Consumer Products CompanyTobacco-free nicotine pouches (NP) v. usual brand CC
  • IRT-Randomization
  • Potential FDA CTP submission  
  • Re: MRTPA Draft Guidance for Industry states that applicants should demonstrate that the product substantially reduces the exposure to substances that are harmful
Open-label, biomarkers of exposure.

In-clinic switching parallel-groups, 

6 IP and 1 Abstinence.

USA, ~5 sites

~200 for ~160 evaluable 

Clinical Trial Case Study, ePRO, IVR, IWR, IRT Case Studies

Contact us to discuss how our team can help you overcome study challenges.

Together, let’s make your next project a success.

Schedule a Demo of Clinical Trial IVR, IWR, ePRO and IRT solutions - IVRCC